A bespoke firm that runs on rails.

Firm-grade work product at machine speed, behind a gate that refuses to let anything unproven leave the building. Speed and accuracy — not a trade-off.

9,427,210
opinions, read in full
36
actions tracked per matter, P0–P10
75
examinations before a filing leaves
557
safeguards proven on wrong input

The product, running

The application, as it runs.

The desk, the matters, a matter opened, its documents searched page by page, the filing checks, and the same practice on a phone.

The desk view listing upcoming dates across every matter.

Every clock, in one place

Rule clocks, court-set dates and appearances across every matter, soonest first. Each date carries the rule that sets it, so you can check the arithmetic instead of trusting it.

  • Filters that mean something: appearances, rule clocks, court-set dates, papers to file.
  • Ten matters on one screen, ordered by what is closest, not by what was opened last.

74 stages stand between a draft and a court.

Every one of them is invoked on every paper — authority, argument, form, forum, sources, exhibits, service, dates, parties and numbers, each measured on the finished page. Below is a single draft. The stages named are the ones that returned a finding on it; the rest ran and passed, which is what passing looks like.

18

Authority and citation

15

Argument and craft

9

Form, forum and filing

8

Source and provenance

7

Adversarial review

5

Exhibits and service

5

Release control

3

Dates and clocks

2

Parties and privacy

2

Numbers

What each stage tests is not published. The count and the lanes are, because a client is entitled to know how much stands between a draft and a clerk.

Motion for summary disposition — commercial lease

5 stages shown · 1 stop

  • Standard of review statedclear

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a), reviewed de novo, with the authority that sets it.

  • Burden statedclear

    Movant carries the initial burden; it does not shift until met.

  • Read-first provenanceclear

    11 of 11 cited opinions read in full and logged.

  • Holding matchstops the filing

    Marchetti is cited for a proposition the majority did not reach. It appears only in the concurrence.

  • Opponent engagementlook

    Their brief cites 14 authorities. This answers 9. Five are unaddressed.

A recorded demonstration on invented papers.

What you receive

i

The matter, held whole

Parties, docket, deadlines, authorities, evidence and the service record are one file on your machine — not an account you rent. Every session opens already knowing the case; you never brief it again from the beginning.

ii

The clocks, computed from the rule

Response windows, objection and waiver periods, reconsideration and appeal — each derived from the forum’s own rule and carrying that rule’s citation, so a date can be checked rather than trusted.

iii

The case, built

Facts chained to the exhibit that proves them, a timeline that every event writes to, discovery graded against the responding forum’s standard, and exhibit binders with covers, numbering and redaction applied by machine.

iv

Research that reads the opinion

Statute, court rule, binding case law, the equity behind them, and the authority that runs against you — opened and read in full across 9,427,210 opinions and 77,481,570 citation links between them. A holding is never read alone.

v

The paper, rendered to the forum

Complaints, motions, answers, declarations and letters in the form the forum expects — standard of review, burden and relief stated in terms, citations resolved against 18,123,757 reporter entries before they reach your page.

vi

The refusal

75 examinations stand between a draft and a court, and every one of them can stop it. A check that cannot finish blocks as well — an unfinished examination is never recorded as a clean one.

The part no one else will show you

It tells you the paper is not ready, and why.

Not a confidence score, and not a suggestion. The defect named the way the court would name it — and the document held back until it is cured.

The documents view: a motion marked as needing a look, with the reason given — the gate has never run against this document, so it is not a clean paper but an unchecked one — and beneath it a second paper whose standard of review is not stated with authority.

The assembly line

36 actions, tracked and enforced on every matter.

The same stages a top litigation shop runs — except the system keeps the list, scores every action as done, pending, overdue or blocked at the gate, and never has to be asked whether a route was exhausted.

Preservation and litigation hold → adverse-party intelligence → limitations and tolling → complaint pleaded to each element → answer-admission extraction → initial disclosures → interrogatories, production and admissions → line-by-line scrutiny and a contradiction matrix → meet and confer → motions to compel, for sufficiency, for spoliation, for summary disposition, in limine → depositions and third-party subpoenas → expert retention → witness and exhibit books → pre-hearing brief → direct and cross outlines → post-hearing brief.

Compare memberships

The same engine on every plan. What changes is seats, sharing and where it runs.

What each membership includes
MembershipIndividual$19 a monthTeam$199 a monthEnterpriseBy arrangement
Active mattersUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
DocumentsUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Citation verificationUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Case managementIncludedIncludedIncluded
Drafting and filingIncludedIncludedIncluded
Seats13 includedUnlimited
Shared matters and administrationNot includedIncludedIncluded
API accessNot includedIncludedIncluded
Deployment on hardware you ownNot includedNot includedIncluded

How to begin

i

Request an invitation

Membership is by invitation. Ask for access, and we send you an invite code.

ii

Install the kit

Download your kit and run the installer. Every release is signed, and the signature is verified before it installs.

iii

Open the matter

Parties, docket and deadlines go in once. From then on the system carries them, and every session begins where the last one stopped.

Gage Law

Gage Green Group · Established 2009

Gage Law provides legal research tools, document preparation, and intelligence services. Gage Law does not provide legal advice, attorney representation, or guarantee any legal outcome. No attorney-client relationship is formed by use of this platform. Users are responsible for verifying all information and consulting qualified legal counsel before taking action.

All information is derived from primary source law, public records, and filed court documents. Results depend on the quality of input and the specific circumstances of each matter. Past performance of the platform does not guarantee future results.

By using this service, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.