GAGE INTELLIGENCE

THE RECORD

12 public proceedings across multiple courts and agencies. 225 entities documented. 19 hashed exhibits. Every fact sourced. Every filing audited. Verified Record. The record is the argument.

GAGE GREEN GROUP

Gage Green Group was established in 2009 as a cannabis genetics institution. Over the following decade, the name, the cultivars, and the brand identity became the subject of third-party transactions, trademark proceedings, and related disputes. This page is maintained as a source-backed administrative record regarding those events.

Every proceeding below is tracked, audited, and reviewed through the Gage Intelligence platform. Public-facing outputs are maintained as source-backed public notice, with correction channels and fiduciary publication posture.

TIMELINE

The brand name enters cannabis commerce with documented cultivars, competition wins, and published authority. Distribution expands across multiple continents, establishing commercial presence years before corporate adoption.

Multiple placements at nationally sanctioned cannabis competitions, including first-place results. Documentation confirms international collaboration and establishes substantial brand footprint during this period.

Law enforcement action at commercial facility. Communications record preserved. Contemporaneous multi-million dollar brand offer documented and declined. Subsequent commercial positioning appears in corporate records.

Corporate entity launches under similar brand name while original brand remains in documented prior commerce. Corporate filings record brand purchase transactions and executive appointments with nationally recognized industry partners.

Trademark opposition proceedings commence at federal trademark board. Docket reflects representation by multiple law firms with extensive communications preserved. Founder proceeds pro se throughout proceedings.

Billing records and communications document performance issues across multiple retained-counsel relationships, including missed deliverables and conflict concerns. Public summary limited to record-backed administrative posture.

Documented incident captured on surveillance. During same period, public company announces and closes multi-million dollar acquisition of commercial platform using similar brand name. Transaction history preserved in public records.

Record materials describe forged documents, backdated agreements, interstate transmissions to financial institutions, and entity-control disputes. Server disruption evidence preserved in investigative record.

Federal trademark board recognizes common-law ownership and inherent distinctiveness. Commercial retail footprint exits market, with closures and employment terminations documented in public filings. Related judgment noted as public-record event.

The public corpus goes live. 225 public entities mapped. 19 verified facts. 19 hashed exhibits. 12 public proceedings across multiple courts and agencies. Neural entity mapping traces connections through public filings, court records, corporate registrations, and regulatory databases. Strategic administration coordinates review across proceedings, and every public output is held to honor, integrity, and equity checks.

ACTIVE PROCEEDINGS

Click any proceeding to view its legal basis and timeline.

Trademark Proceedings

ACTIVE

Two proceedings spanning 6+ years. 275+ opposing counsel communications. Pro se throughout. Favorable findings on common-law ownership and inherent distinctiveness.

USPTO TTAB

Legal Basis

15 U.S.C. § 105215 U.S.C. § 1064Priority of use doctrine

Timeline

2016 Sep

A recommendation letter documents the Canadian collaboration behind the later Dope Cup Canada hybrid result.

2018 pre-launch

Preserved witness materials indicate the later brand adopters were told that the mark was already an established brand before the later company selected the name.

2019 Nov 4

TTAB Proceeding No. 91252169 is filed.

2022 Aug 31

TTAB Proceeding No. 91278331 is filed.

2025 Apr

Board confirms common-law ownership and inherent distinctiveness.

2026 Mar

Opposer misses briefing deadlines. Default posture.

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Business Agreement Breach

DRAFT

Breach of written business agreement. Emergency papers prepared for filing.

New York Supreme Court

Legal Basis

Breach of Contract — NY common lawCPLR 6301

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Law Enforcement Raid

IN PREPARATION

July 2017 raid on private facility. Property seizure.

E.D. Michigan

Legal Basis

Unlawful raid and seizure claimsProperty deprivation / conversion claims

Verified Violations (15)

U.S. Const. Amend. IV / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Unreasonable seizure — continued retention of seed bank now legal under 2018 Farm Bill

U.S. Const. Amend. V / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Due process violation — forfeiture of millions in IP coerced under threat of 19 years imprisonment

U.S. Const. Amend. VIII / Timbs v. Indiana— Excessive fines/forfeiture — seed bank worth millions forfeited for offense reduced to misdemeanor

U.S. Const. Amend. XIV / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Equal protection violation — disproportionate raid (15 officers) targeting Asian-American cannabis operator

Legal malpractice— Attorney represented client despite known spousal conflict with prosecutorial office in same county

Legal malpractice— Counsel failed to distinguish seeds (zero THC) from marijuana in forfeiture negotiations

Legal malpractice— Associate counsel advised forfeiture valid without analyzing seeds vs marijuana under Farm Bill

18 U.S.C. § 242— Deprivation of rights under color of law — willful seizure of legal agricultural property

Abuse of process— Using criminal justice system to seize valuable IP rather than address public safety concern

Conversion— Continued retention or destruction of federally legal seed bank property (hemp under Farm Bill)

42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)— Conspiracy to deprive civil rights — Gaede bot attacks coordinated with raid timing

42 U.S.C. § 1986— Neglect to prevent conspiracy — FANG and county failed to investigate coordination between raid and cyber attacks

18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO)— RICO enterprise — association-in-fact of Gaede, Gage Growth Corp, and others to destroy plaintiff's brand and seize IP

U.S. Const. Amend. I / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— First Amendment retaliation — raid timed to Cannabis Cup as punishment for plaintiff's protected speech

Duress— Stipulated forfeiture order signed under extreme duress (19-year imprisonment threat) — voidable

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Cyber Intrusion & Account Interference Matter

IN PREPARATION

Coordinated account interference, bot-driven harassment, unauthorized access.

E.D. Michigan

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1030 — CFAA18 U.S.C. § 2701

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Professional Ethics Referral

FILING

Conflict of interest. 13 exhibits. Independent third-party confirmation.

Attorney Grievance Commission

Legal Basis

MRPC 1.7MRPC 1.9

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Platform Accountability Matter

IN PREPARATION

Systematic removal of brand accounts while competitor bot attacks continue.

N.D. California

Legal Basis

47 U.S.C. § 230Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200

Verified Violations (4)

Subscription agreement— Breach of contract — refusing to provide paid platform services for lawful cannabis-adjacent business

Discrimination— Discrimination against lawful cannabis-adjacent business operations in violation of platform neutrality

Consumer protection statutes— Unfair and deceptive business practices — platform sold subscription then refused services for lawful use

Tortious interference— Tortious interference with business opportunity — AI tool refusal impeded legal case preparation

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

RICO — Racketeering

IN PREPARATION

Pattern of racketeering activity across state lines. 225 entities mapped. Treble damages under § 1964(c).

Federal District Court

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1961–196418 U.S.C. § 1341 — Mail Fraud18 U.S.C. § 1343 — Wire Fraud

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Assault & Property

DRAFT

Unauthorized entry captured on video surveillance. $500,000+ transaction destroyed.

Genesee County Circuit Court

Legal Basis

MCL 600.2907MCL 600.2919a

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Document Forgery & Identity Theft

INVESTIGATION

Forged IRS documents. Backdated operating agreements. FBI referral drafted.

Under Investigation

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1028NY Penal Law § 170.10

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Excessive Force (2020)

DRAFT

November 11, 2020 incident on the side of the road. Injuries documented.

E.D. Michigan

Legal Basis

Use-of-force claimsAssault and battery

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Extortion & Threats Matter

DRAFT

Documented electronic communications. Threats, coercive demands, intimidation.

E.D. Michigan

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 875(d)MCL 750.213

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Corporate Governance

DRAFT

Breach of fiduciary duty. Unauthorized entity formation. Corporate capture.

Michigan Circuit Court

Legal Basis

MCL 450.4404Conversion — MCL 600.2919a

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Cybersquatting

INVESTIGATION

Domain registration and brand impersonation.

Under Investigation

Legal Basis

15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) — ACPAUDRP

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

DOCUMENTED DAMAGES

$64.8M

Conservative

$3.5B

Full Exposure (RICO Treble)

Every figure derived from verified evidence, public filings, market data, and statutory formulas. RICO treble damages calculated under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).

ENTERPRISE MAP

225 entities. 2,644 documented connections.

Scroll to zoom. Drag to pan. Hover to explore.

GAGE· Critical· High· Medium/Low

ENTITIES

225

Public-facing summary defaults to companies, institutions, agencies, courts, and proceeding-linked entities. The broader mapped record remains source-backed and publication-controlled.

Gage Green GroupGage Growth CorpGage Specialties LLCGage Prestige Holdings LLCTerrAscend CorpCanopy Growth CorpConstellation BrandsCookies SFBruce LintonJason WildFocusGrowth CapitalPinnacle EmporiumWolverine PartnersDentonsSaul Ewing Arnstein & LehrKomorn Law PLLCESTTECH IncConsumers EnergyWells FargoAEY Holdings LLCDNA GeneticsAttorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Public Service CommissionUSPTO TTABOakland County Circuit CourtE.D. MichiganFederal District Court+198 more

CONNECTIONS

2,644

Corporate filings. Board seats. Funding chains. Shell entities. Attorney relationships. SEC disclosures. Every connection traced and verified.

2,644documented

WHAT POWERS THIS

THE INTELLIGENCE INFRASTRUCTURE

This is a source-backed legal administration system built from primary-source law, public records, and verified exhibits. The operating posture is disciplined publication, correction readiness, and record stewardship across multiple jurisdictions.

PUBLIC CORPUS

19 verified facts linked to 19 hashed exhibits. 430 legal topics mapped across the Gage Corpus Juris. 7 citation chains traced to -450 BCE. Every assertion traced to a primary source.

ENTITY NETWORK

225 persons, companies, and agencies mapped through SEC filings, state registries, court records, and regulatory databases. 2,644 connections documented.

CITATION ENGINE

410,773 passages indexed from 4,542 primary source texts. 40,278 extracted legal holdings. 19,862 case authorities. 3,096 maxims. 16 argument chains by doctrine. Every citation verified against the library before it ships.

EVIDENCE INTEGRITY

SHA-256 hashing on every exhibit at collection. Append-only audit trail. Gmail messageId chains for email evidence. Accounting-level chain of custody.

INTEGRITY REVIEW

Multi-perspective review on every filing and public summary. Counterargument checks, procedural review, and publication restraint. Nothing ships without source and posture review.

STRATEGIC ADMINISTRATION

Proceeding-by-proceeding sequencing, jurisdiction review, settlement tracking, and operator controls. Honor, integrity, and equity checks apply to every public output.

PUBLIC RECORD MONITORING

SEC EDGAR. FEC campaign finance. OFAC screening. OpenCorporates. CourtListener. State registries. Continuous monitoring of public records and related entity activity.

EQUITY REVIEW

Every document reviewed against 97 CJS volumes, Bracton (1235), Coke (1628), Blackstone, Story, Pomeroy, and 39 equity treatises. Equity maxims, fiduciary duty, clean hands doctrine applied. 5,679 equity jurisdiction authorities indexed.

WORKFLOW ENGINE

9-state case lifecycle. Priority queue. Approval gates — nothing files without the principal's review. Field-level audit trail on every action. Enterprise-grade operations.

Every component is built for long-term record stewardship. One system. One standard. Source first, correction ready, publication disciplined.

NOTICE

This page is maintained as source-backed public notice derived from the filer's own records, filed court documents, and public records. Matters not yet adjudicated are described in documented or record-backed terms and maintained in good faith, with clean hands, and in the public interest.

Any party who believes a statement to be inaccurate may submit a correction to law@gagegreengroup.com with supporting documentation.