GAGE INTELLIGENCE

THE RECORD

28 proceedings across 8 courts and 5 federal agencies. 283 entities documented. 44,054 hashed exhibits. Every fact sourced. Every filing audited. Verified Record. The record is the argument.

GAGE GREEN GROUP

Gage Green Group was established in 2009 as a cannabis genetics institution. Over the following decade, the name, the cultivars, and the brand identity became the subject of third-party transactions, trademark proceedings, and related disputes. This page is maintained as a source-backed administrative record regarding those events.

Every proceeding below is tracked, audited, and reviewed through the Gage Intelligence platform. Public-facing outputs are maintained as source-backed public notice, with correction channels and fiduciary publication posture.

TIMELINE

The brand name enters cannabis commerce with documented cultivars, competition wins, and published authority. Distribution expands across multiple continents, establishing commercial presence years before corporate adoption.

Multiple placements at nationally sanctioned cannabis competitions, including first-place results. Documentation confirms international collaboration and establishes substantial brand footprint during this period.

Law enforcement action at commercial facility. Communications record preserved. Contemporaneous multi-million dollar brand offer documented and declined. Subsequent commercial positioning appears in corporate records.

Corporate entity launches under similar brand name while original brand remains in documented prior commerce. Corporate filings record brand purchase transactions and executive appointments with nationally recognized industry partners.

Trademark opposition proceedings commence at federal trademark board. Docket reflects representation by multiple law firms with extensive communications preserved. Founder proceeds pro se throughout proceedings.

Billing records and communications document performance issues across multiple retained-counsel relationships, including missed deliverables and conflict concerns. Public summary limited to record-backed administrative posture.

Documented incident captured on surveillance. During same period, public company announces and closes multi-million dollar acquisition of commercial platform using similar brand name. Transaction history preserved in public records.

Record materials describe forged documents, backdated agreements, interstate transmissions to financial institutions, and entity-control disputes. Server disruption evidence preserved in investigative record.

Federal trademark board recognizes common-law ownership and inherent distinctiveness. Commercial retail footprint exits market, with closures and employment terminations documented in public filings. Related judgment noted as public-record event.

The intelligence system goes live. 283 entities mapped. 19,832 verified facts. 44,054 hashed exhibits. 28 active proceedings across 8 courts and 5 federal agencies. Neural entity mapping traces connections through SEC filings, court records, corporate registrations, and regulatory databases. Strategic administration coordinates review across proceedings, and every public output is held to honor, integrity, and equity checks.

ACTIVE PROCEEDINGS

Click any proceeding to view its legal basis and timeline.

Legal Basis

15 U.S.C. § 105215 U.S.C. § 1064Priority of use doctrine

Timeline

2016 Sep

A recommendation letter documents the Canadian collaboration behind the later Dope Cup Canada hybrid result.

2018 pre-launch

Preserved witness materials indicate the later brand adopters were told that the mark was already an established brand before the later company selected the name.

2019 Nov 4

TTAB Proceeding No. 91252169 is filed.

2022 Aug 31

TTAB Proceeding No. 91278331 is filed.

2025 Apr

Board confirms common-law ownership and inherent distinctiveness.

2026 Mar

Opposer misses briefing deadlines. Default posture.

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MCL 600.5838Simko v. Blake, 448 Mich. 648 (1995)

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MCL 460.6MCL 460.10

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

Breach of Contract — NY common lawCPLR 6301

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

Unlawful raid and seizure claimsProperty deprivation / conversion claims

Verified Violations (15)

U.S. Const. Amend. IV / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Unreasonable seizure — continued retention of seed bank now legal under 2018 Farm Bill
U.S. Const. Amend. V / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Due process violation — forfeiture of millions in IP coerced under threat of 19 years imprisonment
U.S. Const. Amend. VIII / Timbs v. Indiana— Excessive fines/forfeiture — seed bank worth millions forfeited for offense reduced to misdemeanor
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— Equal protection violation — disproportionate raid (15 officers) targeting Asian-American cannabis operator
Legal malpractice— Attorney represented client despite known spousal conflict with prosecutorial office in same county
Legal malpractice— Counsel failed to distinguish seeds (zero THC) from marijuana in forfeiture negotiations
Legal malpractice— Associate counsel advised forfeiture valid without analyzing seeds vs marijuana under Farm Bill
18 U.S.C. § 242— Deprivation of rights under color of law — willful seizure of legal agricultural property
Abuse of process— Using criminal justice system to seize valuable IP rather than address public safety concern
Conversion— Continued retention or destruction of federally legal seed bank property (hemp under Farm Bill)
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)— Conspiracy to deprive civil rights — Gaede bot attacks coordinated with raid timing
42 U.S.C. § 1986— Neglect to prevent conspiracy — FANG and county failed to investigate coordination between raid and cyber attacks
18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO)— RICO enterprise — association-in-fact of Gaede, Gage Growth Corp, and others to destroy plaintiff's brand and seize IP
U.S. Const. Amend. I / 42 U.S.C. § 1983— First Amendment retaliation — raid timed to Cannabis Cup as punishment for plaintiff's protected speech
Duress— Stipulated forfeiture order signed under extreme duress (19-year imprisonment threat) — voidable

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1030 — CFAA18 U.S.C. § 2701

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MRPC 1.7MRPC 1.9

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

47 U.S.C. § 230Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200

Verified Violations (4)

Subscription agreement— Breach of contract — refusing to provide paid platform services for lawful cannabis-adjacent business
Discrimination— Discrimination against lawful cannabis-adjacent business operations in violation of platform neutrality
Consumer protection statutes— Unfair and deceptive business practices — platform sold subscription then refused services for lawful use
Tortious interference— Tortious interference with business opportunity — AI tool refusal impeded legal case preparation

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1961–196418 U.S.C. § 1341 — Mail Fraud18 U.S.C. § 1343 — Wire Fraud

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MCL 600.2907MCL 600.2919a

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 1028NY Penal Law § 170.10

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MCL 600.5838Unjust EnrichmentFraud — MCL 600.2911

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

Use-of-force claimsAssault and battery

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

18 U.S.C. § 875(d)MCL 750.213

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

MCL 450.4404Conversion — MCL 600.2919a

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

Legal Basis

15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) — ACPAUDRP

All information derived from public records, filed documents, and the filer's own records.

DOCUMENTED DAMAGES

$64.8M
Conservative
$3.5B
Full Exposure (RICO Treble)

Every figure derived from verified evidence, public filings, market data, and statutory formulas. RICO treble damages calculated under 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).

ENTERPRISE MAP

283 entities. 2,582 documented connections.

Scroll to zoom. Drag to pan. Hover to explore.

GAGE· Critical· High· Medium/Low

ENTITIES

225

Public-facing summary defaults to companies, institutions, agencies, courts, and proceeding-linked entities. The broader mapped record remains source-backed and publication-controlled.

Gage Green GroupGage Growth CorpGage Specialties LLCGage Prestige Holdings LLCTerrAscend CorpCanopy Growth CorpConstellation BrandsCookies SFPinnacle EmporiumWolverine PartnersDentonsSaul Ewing Arnstein & LehrKomorn Law PLLCESTTECH IncConsumers EnergyWells FargoAEY Holdings LLCDNA GeneticsAttorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Public Service CommissionUSPTO TTABOakland County Circuit CourtE.D. MichiganFederal District Court+201 more

CONNECTIONS

2,582

Corporate filings. Board seats. Funding chains. Shell entities. Attorney relationships. SEC disclosures. Every connection traced and verified.

2,582documented

WHAT POWERS THIS

THE INTELLIGENCE INFRASTRUCTURE

This is a source-backed legal administration system built from primary-source law, public records, and verified exhibits. The operating posture is disciplined publication, correction readiness, and record stewardship across multiple jurisdictions.

01

KNOWLEDGE GENOME

19,832 verified facts linked to 44,054 hashed exhibits. 430 legal topics mapped across the Gage Corpus Juris. 7 citation chains traced to -450 BCE. Every assertion traced to a primary source.

02

ENTITY NETWORK

283 persons, companies, and agencies mapped through SEC filings, state registries, court records, and regulatory databases. 2,582 connections documented.

03

CITATION ENGINE

1,981,074 passages indexed from 4,542 primary source texts. 40,278 extracted legal holdings. 19,862 case authorities. 3,096 maxims. 16 argument chains by doctrine. Every citation verified against the library before it ships.

04

EVIDENCE INTEGRITY

SHA-256 hashing on every exhibit at collection. Append-only audit trail. Gmail messageId chains for email evidence. Accounting-level chain of custody.

05

INTEGRITY REVIEW

Multi-perspective review on every filing and public summary. Counterargument checks, procedural review, and publication restraint. Nothing ships without source and posture review.

06

STRATEGIC ADMINISTRATION

Proceeding-by-proceeding sequencing, jurisdiction review, settlement tracking, and operator controls. Honor, integrity, and equity checks apply to every public output.

07

PUBLIC RECORD MONITORING

SEC EDGAR. FEC campaign finance. OFAC screening. OpenCorporates. CourtListener. State registries. Continuous monitoring of public records and related entity activity.

08

EQUITY REVIEW

Every document reviewed against 97 CJS volumes, Bracton (1235), Coke (1628), Blackstone, Story, Pomeroy, and 39 equity treatises. Equity maxims, fiduciary duty, clean hands doctrine applied. 5,679 equity jurisdiction authorities indexed.

09

WORKFLOW ENGINE

9-state case lifecycle. Priority queue. Approval gates — nothing files without the principal's review. Field-level audit trail on every action. Enterprise-grade operations.

Every component is built for long-term record stewardship. One system. One standard. Source first, correction ready, publication disciplined.

NOTICE

This page is maintained as source-backed public notice derived from the filer's own records, filed court documents, and public records. Matters not yet adjudicated are described in documented or record-backed terms and maintained in good faith, with clean hands, and in the public interest.

Any party who believes a statement to be inaccurate may submit a correction to law@gagegreengroup.com with supporting documentation.

GAGE GREEN GROUP

Established 2009

HomeThe RecordAsk the LawPricingTermsPrivacyContact

LAW provides legal research tools, document preparation, and intelligence services. LAW does not provide legal advice, attorney representation, or guarantee any legal outcome. No attorney-client relationship is formed by use of this platform. Users are responsible for verifying all information and consulting qualified legal counsel before taking action.

All information is derived from primary source law, public records, and filed court documents. Results depend on the quality of input and the specific circumstances of each matter. Past performance of the platform does not guarantee future results.

By using LAW, you acknowledge that you have read and agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.