Audit

A 100-point audit of your filing.

Paste a complaint, motion or brief. A panel that reads it the way a clerk, a judge, opposing counsel, an appellate court and a court of equity would scores it across six pillars, and every citation is checked against the primary-source library before you rely on it.

0 words

What the Audit Reads

One hundred points across six pillars. Each pillar is scored from the checks that belong to it, and a critical failure is also listed on its own, so it cannot hide inside a good number.

  • Authority of Law · 20 points

    Is jurisdiction properly alleged, and does each claim state one the law recognises? A dedicated authority review reads the argument, and every citation is looked up in the primary-source library.

  • Integrity of Fact · 20 points

    Does each allegation carry facts rather than conclusions, enough to meet the pleading standard, and is every exhibit referenced and cross-referenced?

  • Equity & Clean Hands · 15 points

    Is good faith asserted, and are equitable principles invoked where they belong?

  • Document Perfection · 15 points

    A caption that names the court, the parties and their designations; a signature block with name, capacity and date; a prayer for relief that matches the counts.

  • Procedural Perfection · 15 points

    The steps a clerk checks before anything else, including a jury demand wherever one applies.

  • Strategic Excellence · 15 points

    No emotional, hedging or self-penalising language for the other side to quote back, and a strategic review of how the paper will land.

Five Readers, One Paper

Every check is assigned to the reader who would catch it in practice, so a finding tells you who will notice the problem, not only that it exists.

  • The Clerk

    Caption, signature, exhibits and the procedural steps that decide whether a paper is accepted at the counter.

  • The Judge

    Whether the claims are cognisable, the facts sufficient, the relief consistent and the tone credible.

  • Opposing Counsel

    Every vague phrase, unsupported conclusion and admission that could be turned against you.

  • The Appellate Court

    Whether jurisdiction is alleged so the record survives review.

  • A Court of Equity

    Clean hands, good faith and whether equitable principles are invoked where the paper relies on them.